Gloucester Daily Times Debate on Abortion (50), April 17, 1986

Personal Response to January 16 Letter to the Editor

April 14, 1986

Ms. Karen Morey

96 Western Avenue, Gloucester, MA 01930

Dear Ms. Morey:

I was truly hoping to hear from you following my last letter. I believe your concerns, as once again expressed in your recent letter to the Times, are ill-placed. If I am in error, then please point it out to me, on the basis of solid theological, legal, philosophical and medical data.

The referendum is simply to allow the Massachusetts voters the choice to give back to the legislature the prerogative to outlaw state funded abortions. This is a policy upheld by the United States Supreme Court vis-a-vis the Hyde Amendment which precludes federally funded abortions. To require state funded abortions without the consent of the citizenry of the state is truly coercion. If abortion is such a fundamental right, then why are pro-choice advocates fearful of allowing the voters to express their view on it? Why should my tax dollars pay for abortion? Does that honor my choice?

I have enclosed tow flyers, one amended to advertise a forum I am conducting on April 25 (we haven’t yet published the exact flyer for that date). I invite you to be present.


John C. Rankin


Join Our Mailing List            John’s Speaking Schedule

logo_linkedin             youTube          

TEI International Leadership School

The foundation of Genesis 1-3 interprets the whole Bible, all church history, all political history and all world religions; indeed, it is the foundation for the most rigorous liberal arts education possible. Click here for the textbook: Genesis and the Power of True Assumptions (Volume 2), sixth book listed. Also see an outline of the seven classes taught in the TEI International Leadership School.


House of Lords 17 October 2017

Text of John Rankin’s address on the occasion of the 500th annive5rsary of the Reformation.